Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
See article keywords and concepts |
 We republished Byron Richards' most recent article which specifically points out that this fda Evilization Act of 2007 could allow the fda to get into the business of licensing and selling drugs and medical devices. The bill also expands the financial incest between Big Pharma and the fda by increasing the "user fees" paid by drug companies to the fda for reviewing and approving their drugs.
It is quite clear that the fda is already functioning as the marketing branch of Big Pharma, and this new Evilization Act of 2007 would deepen the financial relationships between the two. |
Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
See article keywords and concepts |
 In fact, the idea that fda bureaucrats and modern medicine promoters are living in a different reality is not far from the truth. I my view, fda decision makers have no connection with reality. They're simply operating on a system of false beliefs and circular reasoning that justifies their efforts to protect Big Pharma profits by exploiting, misleading and directly harming the public.
Have you ever wondered what rules and beliefs actually drive fda decisions in that alternate reality? As a service to NewsTarget readers, I've assembled a few in this article. |
Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
See article keywords and concepts |
 This is a critical point to understand here: The fda believes that a drug that kills 50,000 people is not dangerous enough to pull off the market. Once you understand that point, some questions come to mind about Lybrel. How many women might die from the side effects of this drug? No one knows. It could be zero or a hundred thousand. If no more than 50,000 women are ultimately killed by it, the fda likely claim that's still within a safety margin and that "the drug benefits outweigh its risks!"
What, exactly, is the level of fatalities required for the fda to consider a drug "too dangerous? |
Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
See article keywords and concepts |
 REPPED: A NewsTarget investigation has revealed that the fda knew as early as 2003 that Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) was not linked to cervical cancer. Despite this knowledge, the fda, along with key pharmaceutical companies, has continued to push for the use of HPV vaccinations as a defense against cervical cancer, even when its own research showed no link exists.
Today, NewsTarget publishes, "The Great HPV Vaccine Hoax Exposed," a special report that cites from numerous fda documents and clinical studies to show that HPV vaccines are not only ineffective, they may actually be dangerous! |
Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
See article keywords and concepts |
| In fact, the fda has never announced what level of fatalities it considers high enough to trigger a drug recall. It may be that a drug killing 100,000 people would also be considered "safe" by the fda. Or perhaps even 250,000 people. Technically, there is no level of death that cannot be declared "acceptably safe" by the fda. (An herb, on the other hand, is pronounced as "dangerous at any dose" if it causes even a single fatality. |
Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
See article keywords and concepts |
| The bill also expands the financial incest between Big Pharma and the fda by increasing the "user fees" paid by drug companies to the fda for reviewing and approving their drugs.
It is quite clear that the fda is already functioning as the marketing branch of Big Pharma, and this new Evilization Act of 2007 would deepen the financial relationships between the two. |
Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
See article keywords and concepts |
| Just one drug, Vioxx, reportedly killed well over 50,000 Americans according to the FDA's own senior drug safety whistleblower, and yet the fda voted to put that drug right back on the market!
This is a critical point to understand here: The fda believes that a drug that kills 50,000 people is not dangerous enough to pull off the market. Once you understand that point, some questions come to mind about Lybrel. How many women might die from the side effects of this drug? No one knows. It could be zero or a hundred thousand. |
Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
See article keywords and concepts |
 HR 2900 is the mirror image of Senate Bill 1082 that claimed to reform the fda but mostly gave the agency more money and power, even creating a new entity (Reagan-Udall) that squarely puts fda leaders in the drug business. Health freedom advocates fought hard to amend S 1082 in a way that would protect nutritional supplements from fda tyranny while banning television advertising for new drugs, but the deep pockets won out and the U.S. senate kowtowed to Big Pharma and passed the bill that drug companies preferred. |
Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
See article keywords and concepts |
 By the time you finish chapter three of the film (which contains the most jaw-dropping revelations of fda corruption and scientific fraud), you'll cry out for the criminal prosecutions of key fda decision makers, Big Pharma executives and the authors of the DSM-IV, the "bible" of modern psychiatry. Fifty-six percent of the panel members who created the DSM-IV are on the take from drug companies, pocketing cash, bribes, royalty payments or other fees from the very same companies that profit from the mass marketing of "brain chemistry diseases. |
Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
See article keywords and concepts |
| Have you ever wondered what rules and beliefs actually drive fda decisions in that alternate reality? As a service to NewsTarget readers, I've assembled a few in this article. These are the rules that define the dogma of modern "scientific" medicine and pharmacology marketing. These rules are followed by fda bureucrats, drug company executives, psychiatrists, doctors, hospitals and everyone who's currently profiting from the failed system of medicine operating in the United States today.
These rules, by the way, are no joke. This is not a satire piece. |
Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
See article keywords and concepts |
 Tomorrow, the fda could announce that "pasteurization" will suddenly mean jumping up and down barefoot on fresh produce with your tongue stuck frozen to a chilled flagpole, in which case all the food companies in the United States would suddenly have to comply. But for today, pasteurization has been announced by the fda to mean the bombarding of food matter with high energy radiation. If this all seems rather extraneous, that's because it is. Pasteurization could just as easily be declared next week to be the soaking of fresh produce in moose drool. |
Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
See article keywords and concepts |
 And this now completes the full reversal of the fda. The agency now has both feet squarely in Bizarro world.
In doing this, I wonder if the fda realizes it has made itself irrelevant. If the agency is now merely going to pass through drug safety decisions to doctors and patients, then why do we need the fda at all? The agency is no longer a gatekeeper. It is a toll booth, where drug companies pay a toll on their way to customers. And apparently, the toll fee is happily accepted regardless of whether the drug in question helps people or kills them. |
Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
See article keywords and concepts |
| I my view, fda decision makers have no connection with reality. They're simply operating on a system of false beliefs and circular reasoning that justifies their efforts to protect Big Pharma profits by exploiting, misleading and directly harming the public.
Have you ever wondered what rules and beliefs actually drive fda decisions in that alternate reality? As a service to NewsTarget readers, I've assembled a few in this article. These are the rules that define the dogma of modern "scientific" medicine and pharmacology marketing. |
Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
See article keywords and concepts |
| From now on, all words will only mean what the fda declares they should mean. The word, "Pasteurization," for example, will now mean any process used to kill microorganisms, including irradiation, spraying toxic chemicals and launching foods into the dark vacuum of space where they explode like Gallagher's watermelons.
Please disregard all previous definitions of words. They no longer apply in the world of fda newspeak. |
Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
See article keywords and concepts |
 FDA is doing such a great job that they are about to reward the agency with even more money, expanding its powers and deepening its financial ties with Big Pharma. The bill in question (click here for the story) is being renamed on practically a daily basis. It started as the Prescription Drug User Fee Act, was renamed the fda Revitalization Act of 2007, and has just now been transformed into the Enhancing Drug Safety and Innovation Act of 2007.
Does it all seem bewildering? A little too much to track it all? |
Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
See article keywords and concepts |
 And the fda has become the Darth Vader of the empire, using the power of the dark side to inflict pain and destruction upon its enemies in its quest to become the dominate power center of all things related to health. Click here to see our Darth Vader fda cartoon.
As NewsTarget readers already know quite well, modern health care has nothing to do with health or care but everything to do with profits and power. As consumers, we live under a system of medical tyranny. |
Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
See article keywords and concepts |
 While this new fda reform bill still lacks crucial safety provisions for U.S. consumers (such as banning direct-to-consumer drug advertisements), it at least kept two key provisions intact that may help prevent drug companies from engaging in the routine deceptions that have propped up industry profits at the expense of public safety:
1) Big Pharma will not have immunity to lawsuits brought by consumers harmed by dangerous prescription drugs. As you may know, drug companies (and even the White House and fda) have lobbied for granting drug companies blanket immunity from all injury lawsuits. |
Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
See article keywords and concepts |
 Graham put it nicely: "As currently configured, the fda is not able to adequately protect the American public. It's more interested in protecting the interests of the industry. It views industry as its client, and the client is someone whose interest you represent."
The Government Accountability Office has said the fda must change to protect the public. Sen. Grassley and the Senate Committee on Finance came to the same conclusion. |
| The bottom line is the fda must change, or be gutted and rebuilt from the ground up. It must reform in ways much more far reaching than what was outlined in the GAO report, though those changes will no doubt make a difference. Perhaps the fda should take its own slogan to heart: "Do it right the first time. |
| And with 11,500 lawsuits filed against Merck by former Vioxx users, even the public is telling the fda to do its job correctly and protect them from dangerous drugs like Vioxx.
Vioxx was one drug -- one single drug for one single health problem. Look at the damage it caused, and is still causing today. Think about how many deaths could have been prevented if the fda had done its job and stopped Vioxx from reaching the market, or at least quickly pulled the drug from the market once its dangers were apparent. |
| REPPED: Despite lawsuits, whistleblowers and government investigations, the fda continues to ignore its mission of protecting consumers against dangerous food and medicine products. Senate Finance Committee Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, recently criticized the Food and Drug Administration for failing to adequately monitor the safety of drugs after they are approved for the market, saying:
"We get press releases listing accomplishments rather than a meaningful revamping of the way things work inside the fda. |
Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
See article keywords and concepts |
| In time, the criminals running drug companies and the fda will be arrested, tried and convicted for their crimes against humanity, and doctors will suddenly find themselves out of work as the population embraces nutrition and disease prevention, eliminating the need for the ridiculous drugs-and-surgery approach of conventional medicine.
Modern medicine belongs in the history books, and top fda decision makers belong in prison. It's time to move past the immense harm being caused by today's system of medicine and embrace a new era of health freedom. |
Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
See article keywords and concepts |
| This special report reveals:
The fda stating "HPV is not associated with cervical cancer."
Evidence that shows HPV vaccines actually increase the risk of precancerous lesions by 44.6% in some women.
The fda admitting that "most [HPV] infections are short-lived and not associated with cervical cancer."
Why mandatory vaccination policies ultimately lead to the harming of young women.
Why one shocking study published in JAMA (August, 2007) concluded, "No significant evidence of a vaccine therapeutic effect was observed..." and added, "... |
| Despite this knowledge, the fda, along with key pharmaceutical companies, has continued to push for the use of HPV vaccinations as a defense against cervical cancer, even when its own research showed no link exists.
Today, NewsTarget publishes, "The Great HPV Vaccine Hoax Exposed," a special report that cites from numerous fda documents and clinical studies to show that HPV vaccines are not only ineffective, they may actually be dangerous! As revealed in the special report, the Gardasil vaccine has been linked to a 44. |
Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
See article keywords and concepts |
| The fda appears to be subject to no law
This is how the fda operates: Deceive the public by making them think the agency is listening to reason, then suddenly change the rules and leave the public out to dry. The agency operates as if it is subject to no law, rule or regulation of its own. It lies to the public, defends the profits of pharmaceutical companies, and ultimately operates with apparent legal immunity.
In fact, U.S. |
Email this page to a friend
